These functions are POST tools not MUSIC Tools, he said with a smile

That said, with C6 the GUI is much better, and closer to Nuendo, than ever (no argument anymore).Р”ВonРІР‚в„ўt spoil yourself with the 4th mixer, the automation passes, extended routing, Mono/stereo conversion of files +++. What keeps me (only doing music) on Nuendo are/were some small things and some bigger things like the better GUI. It will be cheaper in the long run (trust me as one who have upgraded both paths fron SX1 and N2). My best suggestion if have not used Nuendo and you are only doing music production, stay with Cubase. The Automation from Nuendo could well be categorized as Music tool, but what do I know? The problem starts with the definition of what are Music tools and what are Post tools.Р”Р„nd then some small things that easily could been ported to Cubase from Nuendo, like the 4th mixer view, and the same GUI could be implemented (which has always been beeter in Nuendo). They also needs to earn their money (on Cubase) before developing the x-traРІР‚в„ўs for the Nuendo platform, if you see it from the business/investment side of things. To get some peace of MIND or BRAIN (clever he?) you have to see them as 2 different products for different uses. WK Audio ID- & ID-mix- & ID-Edit Controller

True networking and teamworking on the same project.

Matrix Encoder / Decoder Mix 8 to 2 MixConvert MixerDelay

Adapt project frame rate of imported video fileР”Р‡ourth Mixer Instance + new Hi End AUTOMATION SystemР”Р‡ill Commands: Fill to Punch, Start, End, Loop, Gaps.I think this give you a good overview about the differences between Cubase/Nuendo.Р”Вifferentiation Nuendo 4 (additional Functionality) Р“СћРІвЂљВ¬РІР‚Сљ to Cubase 4Р”Р‡unctionalities for Р“СћРІвЂљВ¬Р•С•audio to pictureР“СћРІвЂљВ¬Р•вЂњ work Nuendo has a more complex automation system, clip packages, advanced marker track system, bussingРІР‚В¦Р”Р„ bunch of things.

Steinberg nuendo 4